Hopes Trump Reality

Ha'aretz broke the non-story with the headline Israeli, Syrian representatives reach secret understandings:

In a series of secret meetings in Europe between September 2004 and July 2006, Syrians and Israelis formulated understandings for a peace agreement between Israel and Syria.

The main points of the understandings are as follows:

• An agreement of principles will be signed between the two countries, and following the fulfillment of all commitments, a peace agreement will be signed.
• As part of the agreement on principles, Israel will withdraw from the Golan Heights to the lines of 4 June, 1967. The timetable for the withdrawal remained open: Syria demanded the pullout be carried out over a five-year period, while Israel asked for the withdrawal to be spread out over 15 years.
• At the buffer zone, along Lake Kinneret, a park will be set up for joint use by Israelis and Syrians. The park will cover a significant portion of the Golan Heights. Israelis will be free to access the park and their presence will not be dependent on Syrian approval.
• Israel will retain control over the use of the waters of the Jordan River and Lake Kinneret.
• The border area will be demilitarized along a 1:4 ratio (in terms of territory) in Israel's favor.
• According to the terms, Syria will also agree to end its support for Hezbollah and Hamas and will distance itself from Iran.

You can tell the excitement this has stimulated within Ha'aretz given the plethora of spin-off articles:

More on the Israel-Syria contacts:

• The full text of the draft document
• BACKGROUND: From Turkey, via Europe, to Damascus
• Timeline of talks
• Click here for map

The article was written by Ha'aretz correspondent, Akiva Eldar. I met Eldar in Israel a few years ago and was struck by his stubborn faith in the Oslo process, suggesting a return to it three years after its collapse. By that stage, most Israelis had accepted that Oslo was not only dead, but also a mistake, and perhaps even a driver of the Palestinian terrorist war known as the second intifada. Except for a few hopefuls like Eldar.

Neville Chamberlain was the first to set aside the reality of security for hope and faith in peace with the Munich Agreement.

Back to the Syrian peace understandings. Setting aside the news that the relevant Israelis and Syrians reject these meetings happened or any understandings were agreed upon, what is interesting is the content of what was allegedly agreed.

In particular, consider the commitments through the lens of two attributes - reversibility of commitment, and impact on military balance of power:

• Peace agreement signed: easily reversible, no change to military balance of power
  
• Israel withdraw from the Golan: not easily reversible, favours Syria
  
• Kinneret Park: easily reversible, no change
  
• Control of waters: not easily reversible, no change
  
• Demilitarised zone: easily reversible, no change
  
• Relationship with Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran: easily reversible, favours Israel
  

Therefore, if the understandings had turned into an agreement, which subsequently broke down, Israel would be left with control of the waters and Syria with control of the Golan.

The other aspects would revert back to where we are now, i.e. no Kinneret park for joint use, no peace agreement, a militarised border and Syria re-establish connection with Hezballah, Hamas and Iran.

The shift to Syria of the military balance of power would remain intact.

The Oslo process shattered the idea of giving away tangible assets, like land and military equipment, for intangibles like commitment to peace. Particularly when doing such a deal with a tyrant. The Syrian understandings seem like a case of Munich and Oslo lessons not learned.

When will an agreement require Israel's counterparty to offer something as permanent and strategically important as that offered by Israel?

Oh ABC News, Where Art Thou?

ABC News Online has this side image in its World section, drawing readers into the Middle East Conflict part of the website:

Note the words Complete coverage.

I hate to disappoint ABC News Online readers out there, but I think Aunty missed at least one newsworthy item this week.

Palestinian Authority Chairman addressed a crowd at Fatah's 42nd anniversary.

Jerusalem Post's reporter - and brave Muslim journalist - Khaled Abu Toameh covered the rally in his article titled Abbas: Aim guns against occupation:

Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday called on Palestinians to refrain from internal fighting and to direct their guns only against Israeli "occupation."

Abbas, speaking during a rally marking the 42nd anniversary of the founding of his Fatah party, told thousands of supporters that the Palestinian struggle would continue until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital.

He also expressed opposition to the idea of establishing a Palestinian state with temporary borders."The issue of the refugees is non-negotiable," Abbas said. "We will not give up one inch of land in Jerusalem and we consider the settlements illegal. We also reject any attempt to resettle the refugees in other countries."

The "moderate" Mahmoud Abbas lets his guard down in front of a home crowd, and the ABC misses it. Completely.

The ABC reminds me of Officer Barbrady: "Okay people, nothing to see here!"

A Neater Solution

From the ABC News Online article, Red Crystal becomes third emblem of IRC, an interesting choice of word to describe the solution:

The International Red Cross (IRC) has an additional emblem from today - the Red Crystal.

The red diamond on a white background will serve as an alternative protective sign for relief workers in war zones, instead of the red cross or the red crescent.

A new third emblem for the Red Cross movement may sound unnecessary, but the Red Crystal brings to an end decades of bitter wrangling, which went to the heart of the Middle East conflict.

For years Israel demanded recognition under the Geneva Conventions of the Red Star of David - the emblem used by its relief society.

But Arab states refused.

The new Red Crystal was a neat solution to break the deadlock and at the same time offer a neutral emblem to any country which objected to either the cross or the crescent on religious grounds.

For whom exactly is this solution neat?

A neater solution would have been to allow the Red Star of David or Magen David Adom.

Sheikh-en Out of Context

If I had a dollar for every time Sheikh Taj el-Din Al Hilali's comments were alleged to have been "taken out of context", I could pay to have my convict background rewritten and a cover for my cat meat.

In the meantime, enjoy this Google search returning more than a thousand results.

ABC = Androgenous Broadcasting Corporation

The ABC can't decide whether Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is a man or a woman.

First, there is this sentence in their article Bush hits back at Iraq plan critics:

But at a joint news conference with Mr Livni, Dr Rice did not underestimate the task.

Soon after, in their very next article Rice in Middle East for fresh peace push:

For her part, Ms Livni said she supported the idea.

What's with the flipping gender agenda?

Tim Blair covers this and earlier Mr Tzipi mistakes.

The ABC should keep this photo of Livni close by their Middle East Conflict editor:

Memo to budding ABC journalists: Livni is the one on the right.

Evaluating Bush's Strategy

A recent posting prior to Bush's recent announcement laid out the five tests for determining how successful the strategy would be. Let's see how they stack up:

1. Will the rules of engagement change to enable US soldiers' to go on the offense rather than just defend themselves?

The answer is probably. Time will tell, but the positives are that the US soldiers will embed with the Iraqis and look to have a more permanent role in the clear, hold and build strategy.

2. Will Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki reluctantly accept it with rhetoric pushback and the Shi'ite thug Moqtada al-Sadr oppose it?

It was first announced that Maliki was part of putting the plan together, which would not be a positive. However, it now appears as though Maliki looked into the abyss that is the future, and realised he two choices: get off the Shi'ite fence and act, or a fall of the Iraqi government through US withdrawal of support. Provided Maliki feels pressured to act for the benefit of Iraq and not just the Shi'ites and Iran, the signs are good.

While Moqtada al-Sadr will not be happy, it remains to be seen if he will actually be confronted. Arguably the biggest short-term test.

3. Will it be widened to such an extent that Iran and Syria feel directly threatened by it?

In words, yes. But deeds matter more, so again, the jury is out. A positive sign is the warning action in Irbil where Iranian 'diplomats' were captured. This is a test of will. If the US does not blink, there is an outside chance the tide can be turned.

4. Will it cause the US public to now accept their country is now in the midst of a long regional war, perhaps indeed a global war?

Too early to tell. A good bellweather will be the response of the US Democrat Party, and any independent-thinking elements within the Republican Party. If they remain muted in a 'wait and see' posture, then the public will have given Bush a grace period.

5. Will there be criticism of it by the UN, Russia, China and western Europe?

Haven't heard much yet, so this could go either way.

Five Tests for Bush's New Strategy

US President George W Bush is soon to announce a new strategy for Iraq. There are five tests that will determine if it will succeed. None relate to the number of troops deployed.

They are:

1. Will the rules of engagement change to enable US soldiers' to go on the offense rather than just defend themselves?

2. Will Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki reluctantly accept it with rhetoric pushback and the Shi'ite thug Moqtada al-Sadr oppose it?

3. Will it be widened to such an extent that Iran and Syria feel directly threatened by it?

4. Will it cause the US public to now accept their country is now in the midst of a long regional war, perhaps indeed a global war?

5. Will there be criticism of it by the UN, Russia, China and western Europe?

If the answer is yes to all, then the strategy has the maximum chance of succeeding.

Breaking News: Hizb ut-Tahrir Sydney Conference Shut Down

Via Little Green Footballs, news that the Bankstown City Council has shut down the Khalifah Conference. The information can be found at the organisation's website:

Sydney, Australia - The decision taken today by Bankstown City Council to cancel the venue for the up-coming Khilafah Conference displays the hollowness of the ‘free speech’ rhetoric.

Without proper explanation or consultation, the council has unilaterally withdrawn the availability of the Bankstown Town Hall as the venue for the Khilafah Conference to be held on the 27th January 2007.

Wassim Doureihi, spokesperson for Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia, says: “The decision taken today by Bankstown City Council speaks volumes of the empty rhetoric surrounding the supposed noble epitomes of western liberal democracy.”

The key message is in the last sentence.

Islamists use whatever tools modern free societies are available in their quest to establish a non-western non-liberal non-democratic Caliphate. These tools include freedom of speech, freedom to gather and protest, freedom to vote and freedom of expression in the media (both traditional and new).

And none of it is original: even their fascist and anti-Semitic streaks are rehashed philosophies of 19th and 20th century Europeans.

If they were to succeed, then there would be no more democracy. Fear would replace freedom. We don't have to imagine what it would be like: we have seen some of the most recent Islamist governments in power. These were Taliban in Afghanistan and the Islamist Courts Union in Somalia.

Only one remains today: Hamas in Gaza.

Hizb ut-Tahrir Sydney Conference Watch

Hizb ut-Tahrir have organised a conference on 27 January 2007 in Bankstown, Sydney.

The conference is called Khalifah Conference 2007. Khalifah is another word for Caliphate, the term that denotes an Islamic world run according to Shari'a law.

The organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir is banned in many countries, but an attempt to ban them in Australia and the UK failed.

They don't like Jews or Israel as seen in their article The Muslim Ummah will never submit to the Jews. They also don't like Ariel Cohen who doesn't seem to be a big fan of them: see here.

Behold the promo video:



The website listed at the end of the video contains more info about Hizb ut-Tahrir, presumably spun by its members.

This article in the Herald Sun highlights the government's inability to ban the group and stop the conference (hat tip: Little Green Footballs).

neoZionoid will be keeping an eye out for any further info that comes to light on this conference.

In Briefs

A primer about the nature of the enemy begins:

Given the stakes involved in this war and how little is known, even now, about what is at the core of this conflict, it is worth reviewing in some detail the nature of our enemy - including disaggregating who they are (Shia and Sunni extremists), what they believe and why they believe it, and the implications of that for America and the West.

Read it all here.

Israel is often called the canary in the coal mine, effectively a looking glass into the future for other Western countries, particularly when it comes to the interaction with the enemy. A disturbing feature of such interaction:

38 of the 272 suicide bombings in Israel (roughly 14 percent) were carried out by terrorists that had received Israeli citizenship in the context of family reunification

Read on here.

ABC News Online has an article called Fatah stages show of force that begins:

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah party has celebrated its 42nd anniversary with a mass rally in Gaza City that amounted to a show of force against its rival, the governing Hamas.

Note it's a 42-year anniversary. That's 1965 when Fatah was established (1964 to be exact). This preceded the Six Day War in which Gaza, Judea and Samaria (an earlier name for the West Bank) were captured by Israel in a defensive war. Thus putting paid to the idea that Fatah is only trying to "liberate" the lands "occupied" in 1967.

Something to worry about:

Federal authorities have investigated whether Islamic extremists from Saudi Arabia had sought to fund a mosque in South Australia, Foreign Minister Alexander Downer says.

Mr Downer said there were concerns that a Saudi-funded Adelaide mosque could have become a breeding ground for extremists.

"I can say that there have been investigations by federal authorities in Adelaide into funding for mosques from Saudi Arabia," he told ABC radio in Adelaide on Monday morning.

"And by funding from Saudi Arabia, I don't mean funding by the Saudi Arabian government, but by extremist groups in Saudi Arabia."

Gee, I hope it was funded by the extremist Saudi Arabian government and not extremist groups in Saudi Arabia.

Alan Dershowitz is on song again:

The international community's obsessive focus on the State of Israel caused it to miss out on genocides all around the world, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz told a rally in a Toronto synagogue last week, according to a report in the Canadian Jewish News.

"Six million additional people have died since the end of the Second World War because of this obsessive focus on Israel," Dershowitz was quoted as saying, citing global inaction over the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, and the slaughter currently taking place in Darfur.

The magician's art of distraction.

Finally, what do terrorists do in a period of calm (tahdiye) or ceasefire (hudna)? Answer given here:

The noteworthy drop in Israeli casualties from Palestinian attacks belies the fact that there has been "significant escalation on the ground in terms of the threat levels and the number of attempts to dispatch suicide bombers" in recent months, a senior officer in the IDF Central Command told reporters yesterday.

Relaying data on violence in the territories during the past year, the officer said that 187 Palestinians, currently in Israeli custody, were involved in conspiracies to carry out suicide bombing attacks in 2006.

Last year, 11 Israeli citizens were killed in two suicide bombings perpetrated within the Green Line, the lowest such figure since 2001.

According to the senior officer, the greatest asset in the arsenal of the security forces is the ability to operate freely in Palestinian cities.

During the period of tahdiye (calm), between January and September of 2005, the IDF avoided entering Palestinian towns, but once the agreement that led to the calm collapsed, it was necessary to use greater numbers of troops in order to renew operations inside the cities.

Someone needs to turn the tap off, not just put the plug in the sinkhole.

News in Briefs

1. Checkout this photo from AP on Jerusalem Post's website:

The caption:

Palestinian Fatah-loyalist security forces fire towards Hamas gunmen. [File]

Observations:

- what the @$#% is that civilian wandering past gunmen in the middle of a firefight? No wonder there are so many non-combatant deaths in Gaza.

- where is the gunmen on the left aiming? Unless the target is up on the first floor, or they have smart bullets, it's going to be a long, long firefight.

- I wouldn't want to be in the front row (seen on the right of the picture). There is equal danger of being shot from behind by one's fellow fighters than in the front by the enemy.

2. We welcome Dry Bones Blog to the blogroll on the right-hand side of this blog. Dry Bones has been illustrating humorous cartoons for many years, including those that appear on the Jerusalem Post website. He has a daily blog. Check it out.

3. The ABC Online Editors must either be holidays or turned their back on the Middle East. Overnight, more Palestinians have been killed in factional fighting, as Khaled Abu Toameh reports:

Eight more Palestinians were killed Thursday in armed confrontations between Hamas and Fatah members in the Gaza Strip, bringing the death toll to 13 over the past 48 hours. At least 16 Palestinians were wounded in Thursday's fighting.

Meanwhile, IDF operations in Ramallah, Bethlehem and northern Gaza strip resulted in the apprehension of one terror suspect, the failed attempt to arrest another, and four Palestinian deaths in the resultant gunfights, presumably as Palestinians defended the terror suspects. Jerusalem Post has a good summary here.

So what news do we get at the ABC?

Nothing.

(Incidentally, "Briefs" in the title was not a typo. I'm taking blogging one stage further than Pajamas Media. No pictures though.)

Sins of Omission

It's hotting up again in the Gaza Strip, as Ha'aretz reports:

Assailants targeted three senior Hamas officials in the West Bank, kidnapping one, torching the car of a second and shooting in the air as a third emerged from a mosque, officials said Thursday.

Although there was no immediate claim of responsibility, the attacks came a day after four supporters of the rival Fatah group were killed in factional fighting in the Gaza Strip. Gaza is a Hamas stronghold, while Fatah dominates in the West Bank.

Late Wednesday, gunmen stormed the home of Deputy Health Minister Bashar Karmi in the West Bank town of El Bireh and seized him. Arab satellite TV stations reported that he was released Thursday morning, but the report could not immediately be confirmed independently.

Wow. Kidnappings of ministers. Torching of cars. Shooting at mosque-goers. Four killed yesterday. Maybe a chance for the mainstream media to crank out the "brink of civil war" phrase again.

Let's check out the lastest in the Middle East Conflict section of ABC News Online to see how they are reporting it:

Israel fires at Palestinian farmers: medics

Medics say three Palestinian farmers have been wounded by Israeli fire in northern Gaza near the border with the Jewish state.

The Israeli Army says it is not aware of the incident.

Under a November 26 cease-fire, Israel withdrew its troops from Gaza and militants were supposed to stop firing rockets.

Since then, around 70 rockets have been fired into Israel and one Palestinian has been killed.

At least six Palestinians have been wounded by Israeli fire in the Gaza Strip since the truce was called.

Hmm. Interesting news to choose off the wire service feed above everything else that is happening.

Anything else in that section? Let's take a look:


Nope. Nothing there about the death and destruction between Hamas and Fatah.

I wonder where it could be?

Of course! My mistake ... it must be in the Middle East section of the World News page:

Mother Hubbard, Mother Hubbard.

So where is it, Aunty?

UPDATE: BBC now reporting five dead. ABC continues to report zero.

UPDATE: Finally, the ABC climbs out of its torpor to report Six killed in Gaza clashes.

Ten Most Wanted Deposed for 2007

In keeping with the end-of-year and start-of-year top tens, here is my list of the ten people whom I want removed from power and influence in 2007:

1. Ali Khamenei (will not live to see out 2007)
2. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
3. Moqtada al-Sadr
4. Nouri al-Maliki
5. Mahmoud Abbas
6. Kim Jong-Il
7. Vladimir Putin
8. Bashar Assad
9. Hassan Nasrallah
10. Hugo Chavez

The Domino Theory of Conflict Resolution

Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israeli-Syrian conflict. Israeli-Lebanon conflict. Israeli-Arab conflict. Israeli-Iranian conflict. Israeli-insert-your-Middle-Eastern-grievance-here conflict.

It's the key to Middle East peace. If we only just solve the conflict(s), then all countries will sue for peace.

Then all countries would allow economic development, personal freedoms and democracy to flourish. Al Qaeda would close down, and Osama bin Laden would abandon his quest for a global caliphate in preference to starting a Shopping Channel on pay-TV. Global warming would disappear. The English soccer team would win the World Cup.

The assumption is a positive correlation, perhaps a causative effect, of any Israeli-centric conflict resolution and Middle East peace. The logic goes: solve the conflicts with Israel (i.e. Israeli concessions including existential ones) and the rest will follow. The Domino Theory of Conflict Resolution.

Memo to those "Imagine-all-the-people" global citizenoids: there never will be long-term peace in the world, regardless of whether Israel - and the conflicts related to her - exist or not.

Some people not suffering from delusions of world peace argue that it is neither correlative nor causative.

Close, but not quite correct.

There does seem to be a correlation between a focus on conflicts involving Israel and the rest of the Middle East conflicts. It is not the actual conflict involving Israel that is the problem, but the discussion of it and the perceived linkage to it.

The reasoning is this. Conflicts involving Israel are a convenient excuse for unrelated problems and root causes. It serves a useful distraction for those responsible for the real problems, who include tyrants, radical Islamists and terrorists (some are members of more than one of these clubs).

However, as a self-fulfilling prophecy, once those club members have suckered in other world leaders and "honest" brokers into believing the issues are linked, they effectively are. Perception is reality.

The cart is then put before the horse. The focus is no longer on root causes, but on moot causes.

The first step to solving Middle East issues is not to try resolve those involving Israel. It is to decouple and isolate them.

Knocking over the Israeli dominos won't make the other dominos fall. They aren't even in the same room.

Which is why people like Tony Blair, so on the mark about the importance of values and ideology, is so disappointingly off the mark when he claims that solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the opening act in the Middle East peace show.

Perhaps Blair is suffering from the same "leave-a-legacy" disease that afflicted Bill Clinton in his autumnal years in office, vis-a-vis the Camp David push for an Oslo-accord peace, which in turn accelerated the intifada.

Depressingly, now comes another actor onto the stage in this tragical farce, but at the start of his reign: Ban Ki-Moon, the new UN Secretary-General.

From a Jerusalem Post article:

Ban Ki-Moon, the new secretary-general of the United Nations, said on Monday that the Israeli-Palestinian issue was at the core of solving all the problems in the Middle East.

Groan.

"If the issues with the conflicts between Israel and Palestine go well, [resolutions of] other issues in the Middle East, including Lebanon, Iran, Iraq and Syria, are likely to follow suit. I will meet with the concerned parties as soon as possible," Ban said in an interview.

Thought to self: How long until Ban-Ki Moon retires?

Even A Stopped Watch Is Correct Twice a Day

Sometimes even evil men get it right. This from Iranian millenarian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad scorned the UN Security Council's imposing sanctions on Iran, telling a crowd Tuesday that Iran had humiliated the United States in the past and would do so again.

Declaring war on the United States 27 years ago. US Embassy hostages in Tehran. Khobar Towers. Marine Barracks in Lebanon. Iranian IEDs killing US soldiers in Iraq. Nuclear weapons programs.

The best the US can do is a watered-down UN resolution and James Baker's recommendation to ask Iran to stop the mayhem while their soldiers cut and run.

Mahmoud's assessment is more accurate than a Reuters photo.

Ahmadinejad continues, this time with reference to the UN:

Speaking in the southwestern provincial capital of Ahvaz, Ahmadinejad said the Security Council's resolution of Dec. 23 was invalid and had left the world body's reputation in tatters.

Strictly speaking, by December 23 the UN's reputation was already in as many shreds as the Oil-for-Fraud documents in the UN offices shortly after the US Congress issued a subpoena for them.

Toying With The Reader

Following on from his other amusing parodies of Reuters, Aussie Dave of Israellycool fame has once again thumped Reuters out of the park.

This time it's for their use of the words "toy gun" in a photo caption.

Read his post and see the photo in question here.

If I had a dollar for every photo throughout the year of a Palestinian child with guns and/or explosives in their possessions, I'd be able to buy up and donate a couple of greenhouses in Gaza.

UPDATE: The Best of 2006: Top 10 Separated At Birth photos are even better.

Reason to Celebrate the New Year

Woohoo!

Where Are They Now?

Jerusalem Post has an article about assassination plots to be carried out in Australia in 1975:

According to intelligence documents released on Sunday, terrorists planned to kill pro-Israel politician Bob Hawke (who was to become prime minister in 1983), then Israeli ambassador Michael Elizur, [businessman, community leader and JPost contributor Isi] Leibler and journalist Sam Lipski.

Buried deep in the middle of the article is an interesting piece of information:

The details were in a secret ASIO report that had been presented to the cabinet of prime minister Malcolm Fraser. The report described the terrorist threat to Australia at a time when Palestinian groups were hijacking aircraft and carrying out attacks aimed at Jewish institutions in Europe and the Middle East.

ASIO identified a key figure in the plan as Munif Mohammed (Ahmed) Abu Rish, who came to Australia in 1974 claiming to be a journalist and indicated he would return in 1975 to plan the ambassador's assassination. The terrorists were reportedly given fake passports by Palestinians living in Australia.

So what happened to the Palestinians living in Australia who aided and abetted Abu Rish?

UPDATE: ABC News Online covers this incident here. But doesn't dig deep enough about the co-conspirators.

The Price of Jewish Blood

First it was Saddam Hussein's US$25,000 bounty paid to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.

Now, from a New York Post article, Hizbollah is paying Palestinians to fire Qassam rockets into Israel to kill Israelis:

Hezbollah and its Iranian backers are rewarding Palestinian terrorists with thousands of dollars for each homemade rocket that hits southern Israel, according to Israeli intelligence.

The size of the payoffs depends on the number of Israelis killed or wounded, the Jerusalem Post reported yesterday.

Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based guerrilla group that fought a border war with Israel last summer, is smuggling cash from Iran into the Gaza Strip to pay off different terrorist organizations who launch homemade Qassam rockets into the western Negev region of Israel.

"Sometimes, they are paid before the attack and sometimes they submit a bill to Lebanon and the money gets transferred a short time later," a security official said.

The reward for killing Jews used to be 72 virgins in Paradise. Israel's restraint in no longer targetting terrorists seems to have forced payments to be made in advance rather than in arrears.

Question: Money is transferred to terrorists. Which banks are being used?

(Hat tip: Pajamas Media)

Holocaust Archive

Iranian (millenarian) President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is known for questioning the Holocaust while wishing to create another.

How timely is this year's opening of a previously secret archive of information about Holocaust survivors. The archive is in the German town of Bad Arolsen, containing 50 million documents in 16 miles of archive shelving about 17 million victims.

CBS' 60 Minutes put together this video report whereby three Holocaust victims joined the journalist Scott Pelley to see their own records.

Now those UN sanctions are in place that target Iranian officials (and have them sheikhing in their boots), maybe the only travel allowed should be to this archive.

(Hat tip: Chernstar)